Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City Of Eden Prairie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City Of Eden Prairie Anchor | green | “the district court properly considered the provisions of the sign code to be severable in making its overbreadth standing determination.” | 4 |
| 2 | Harp Advertising Illinois, Inc. v. Village of Chicago Ridge, Illinois | green | “an injunction against the portions of the sign and zoning codes that it has challenged would not let it erect the proposed sign; the village could block the sign simply by enforcing another, valid, ordinance already on the books.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.