Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation Anchor | green | “a landowner is not entitled to compensation under article vi simply because he has suffered some loss or his property has been devalued as a result of state action. 'a property right must be invaded before compensation is allowed.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Dawmar Partners, Ltd. | green | “the court may consider circumstances such as the nature of the property involved, the character of the access before and after governmental activity, and the location (rural or urban).” | 2 |
| 3 | State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Miller | green | “the nature of the property involved, the character of the access before and after governmental activity, and the location (rural or urban).” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.