Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc. v. Watersmeet Township.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Institute in Basic Life Principles, Inc. v. Watersmeet Township Anchor | green | “this court should first look to the specific statutory language to determine the intent of the legislature,” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re Ramsey | green | “that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as gathered from the act itself.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.