Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from GPX International Tire Corp v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPX International Tire Corp v. United States Anchor | green | “when commerce has access to information on the record to fill in the gaps created by the lack of cooperation by the government, as opposed to the exporter/producer, however, it is expected to consider such evidence.” | 4 |
| 2 | Guizhou Tyre Co. v. United States | green | “to apply afa in circumstances where relevant information exists elsewhere on the record - that is, solely to deter non-cooperation or 'simply to punish' - . . . that is a fate this court should sidestep.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.