Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Titan Insurance Company v. Hyten.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Titan Insurance Company v. Hyten Anchor | green | “insurance policies are contracts and, in the absence of an applicable statute, are 'subject to the same contract construction principles that apply to any other species of contract.” | 5 |
| 2 | Dobbelaere v. Auto-Owners Insurance | green | “this court has held that whether the issuer of a no-fault insurance policy is the 'insurer' of a household member or family member for purposes of mcl 500.3114(4) 'depends on the language of the relevant insurance policy.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.