Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Bismarck v. Sokalski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Bismarck v. Sokalski Anchor | neutral | “prosecutorial misconduct may so infect the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Pena Garcia | green | “inappropriate prosecutorial comments, standing alone, would not justify a reviewing court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.