Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Pruitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Pruitt Anchor | green | “i have been advised by the court that i have the right to employ an attorney to represent me in this matter at this time or at a later date.” | 3 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Sanchez | green | “contempt cases are considered quasi-criminal in nature, and their proceedings should conform as nearly as practicable to those in criminal cases.” | 2 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Sanchez | green | “should conform as nearly as practicable to those in criminal cases.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.