Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. Anchor | green | “a contract cannot be severed unless the language of the contract manifests each party's intent to treat the contract as divisible.” | 3 |
| 2 | John v. United Advertising, Inc. | green | “a single whole, so that there would have been no bargain whatever, if any promise or set of promises were struck out.” | 2 |
| 3 | John v. United Advertising, Inc. | green | “as a single whole, so that there would have been no bargain whatever, if any promise or set of promises were struck out.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.