Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 77 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Basemore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Basemore Anchor | green | “the petitioner's evidence fails to meet a single one of these prongs.” | 34 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Drumheller | green | “evidence is relevant if it logically tends to establish a material fact in the case, tends to make a fact at issue more or less probable or supports a reasonable inference or presumption regarding a material fact.” | 29 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Sitler | green | “an abuse of discretion is not merely an error of judgment, but is rather the overriding or misapplication of the law, or the exercise of judgment that is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of bias, prejudice, ill-will or partiality, as shown by the evidence of record.” | 6 |
| 4 | Jessie Earl Purvis v. James Crosby | green | “failure of counsel was solely in his role as appellate counsel at trial.” | 3 |
| 5 | Commonwealth v. Williams | green | “on appeal from the denial of pcra relief, our standard of review calls for us to determine whether the findings of the pcra court are supported by the record and are free from legal error.” | 3 |
| 6 | Commonwealth v. Griffin | green | “to rebut accusations or suggestions of fabrication or corruption.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.