Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 78 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey Anchor | red | “a finding of an undue burden is a shorthand for the conclusion that a state regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus.” | 34 |
| 2 | Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey | red | “the proper focus of constitutional inquiry is the group for whom the law is a restriction, not the group for whom the law is irrelevant.” | 31 |
| 3 | Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen | green | “the feebler the medical grounds, the likelier the burden, even if slight, to be 'undue' in the sense of disproportionate or gratuitous.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.