Topic: the forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting p… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4221

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 78 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington v. Harper.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Washington v. Harper Anchor
scotus · 1990
green “the forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty.” 23
2 Sell v. United States
scotus · 2003
green “the government's interest in bringing to trial an individual accused of a serious crime is important.” 17
3 Sell v. United States
scotus · 2003
green “important governmental interests are at stake.” 16
4 Sell v. United States
scotus · 2003
green “substantially unlikely to have side effects that will interfere significantly with the defendant's ability to assist counsel in conducting a trial defense.” 12
5 United States v. Simon Dillon
cadc · 2013
green “administration of the drugs is medically appropriate, i.e., in the patient's best medical interest in light of his medical condition.” 4
6 United States v. Simon Dillon
cadc · 2013
green “if (1) the findings are 'without substantial evidentiary support or ... induced by an erroneous application of the law'; or if (2) 'on the entire evidence we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” 3
7 United States v. Duane Berry
ca6 · 2018
green “where a defendant has already served sufficient time that a guilty verdict will result only in a sentence of time served, the deterrent effect of imprisonment has evaporated,” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check