Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cavers v. HOUSTON MCLANE CO., INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavers v. HOUSTON MCLANE CO., INC. Anchor | green | “the record must be construed in the manner most favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction.” | 4 |
| 2 | Jackson v. Weaver | green | “the proper exercise of personal jurisdiction in a maine court hinges on the satisfaction of two requirements: first, that the maine long-arm statute ... confers personal jurisdiction on the court; and second, that the exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to the long-arm statute com…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.