Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Handy Boat Service, Inc. v. Professional Services, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Handy Boat Service, Inc. v. Professional Services, Inc. Anchor | green | “it is to consider only the portions of the record referred to, and the material facts set forth, in the rule 7(d) statements.” | 4 |
| 2 | Rodrigue v. Rodrigue | green | “entry of summary judgment for errors of law, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment was entered.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.