Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pummill v. Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale (In Re Richards & Conover Steel, Co.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pummill v. Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale (In Re Richards & Conover Steel, Co.) Anchor | green | “party claiming to have delivered value must quantify it.” | 4 |
| 2 | Welt v. Jacobson (In Re Aqua Clear Technologies, Inc.) | green | “once the trustee has made his prima facie case that a transfer constitutes a fraudulent transfer ... the burden of producing evidence shifts to the transferee to demonstrate that the debtor received a benefit or that there was some legitimate purpose for the transfer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.