Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 77 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Mares.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Mares Anchor | green | “would have reached a significantly different result” | 31 |
| 2 | United States v. Juan Raul Izaguirre-Flores | green | “unless and until the supreme court itself determines to overrule it.” | 16 |
| 3 | United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo | green | “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.” | 9 |
| 4 | United States v. Taylor | green | “point to ... evidence in the record suggesting that the district court would have imposed a lesser sentence under an advisory guidelines system.” | 7 |
| 5 | United States v. Lawrence Clyde Bringier, Jr., Also Known as Junior, Also Known as Bread | green | “mere sympathy ... is not indicative of a judge's desire to sentence differently under a non-mandatory guidelines regime.” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. Scott Schirmann Creech | green | “is not indicative of a judge's desire to sentence differently under a non-mandatory guidelines regime.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Scott Schirmann Creech | green | “mere sympathy ... is not indicative of a judge's desire to sentence differently under a non-mandatory guidelines regime.” | 3 |
| 8 | Bringier v. United States | green | “mere sympathy ... is not indicative of a judge's desire to sentence differently under a non-mandatory guidelines regime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.