Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 77 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Priester v. City of Riviera Beach.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Priester v. City of Riviera Beach Anchor | green | “facts, as accepted at the summary judgment stage of the proceedings, may not be the actual facts of the case.” | 65 |
| 2 | EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. Grissett | green | “(1) the existence of a valid contract binding the parties in the action, (2) their own performance under the contract, (3) the defendant's nonperformance, and (4) damages.” | 7 |
| 3 | Bernard Campbell v. Secretary, Department of veterans Administration | green | “the plain meaning of these provisions show that objecting to the admissibility of evidence supporting a summary judgment motion is now a part of summary judgment procedure, rather than a separate motion to be handled preliminarily” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.