Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Warren Police and Fire v. Prudential Financial Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Warren Police and Fire v. Prudential Financial Inc Anchor | green | “under that standard, the complaint must describe the time, place, and contents of the false representations or omissions, as well as the identity of the person making the statement and the basis for the statement's falsity.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation | green | “a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake, although 'intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind may be alleged generally.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.