Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Abed v. Commissioner of Correction.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abed v. Commissioner of Correction Anchor | green | “subject matter jurisdiction for adjudicating habeas petitions is conferred on the superior court by general statutes 52-466 , which gives it the authority to hear those petitions that allege illegal confinement or deprivation of liberty.” | 4 |
| 2 | Laden v. Warden | green | “there may be a commutation of the total length of sentence that must be served.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.