Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Worden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Worden Anchor | green | “the prosecutor, defense counsel and the court all suffered from the same misunderstanding of the court's sentencing discretion, it would be unreasonable to conclude that defendant understood it” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Johnson | green | “it is impossible to have confidence, on a record like this, that defendant had a clear understanding of what he was doing when he entered his plea,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.