Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Stubbs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Stubbs Anchor | green | “while rule 21 might appear at first glance to limit the jurisdiction of the court of appeals, the rules cannot take away jurisdiction given to that court by the general assembly in accordance with the north carolina constitution.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Ledbetter | green | “a valid statute gives the court of appeals jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari, rule 21 cannot take it away.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.