Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 447 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taylor v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor v. United States Anchor | green | “an unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime.” | 94 |
| 2 | Taylor v. United States | green | “unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or structure, with intent to commit a crime.” | 88 |
| 3 | Shepard v. United States | green | “the terms of the charging document, the terms of a plea agreement or transcript of colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant, or to some comparable judicial record of this information.” | 78 |
| 4 | Shepard v. United States | green | “the statutory definition, charging document, written plea agreement, transcript of plea colloquy, and any explicit factual finding by the trial judge to which the defendant assented.” | 76 |
| 5 | Taylor v. United States | green | “look only to the fact of conviction and the statutory definition of the prior offense.” | 55 |
| 6 | Shepard v. United States | green | “charging document, written plea agreement, transcript of plea colloquy, and any explicit factual finding by the trial judge to which the defendant assented.” | 48 |
| 7 | United States v. Stitt | green | “includes burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation.” | 5 |
| 8 | United States v. Meader | green | “the standard approach for determining whether a particular crime fits within the 'crime of violence' rubric is a generic one, in which inquiry is restricted to the statutory definitions of prior offenses, without regard to the particular facts underlying them.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.