Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sproull v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sproull v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. Anchor | green | “the construction should be a natural and reasonable one.” | 4 |
| 2 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Elmore | green | “a policy term is not ambiguous because the term is not defined within the policy or because the parties can suggest creative possibilities for its meaning.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.