Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Becker v. Schwartz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Becker v. Schwartz Anchor | green | “must demonstrate the existence of a duty, the breach of which may be considered the proximate cause of the damages suffered by the injured party.” | 5 |
| 2 | Peralta v. Quintero | green | “to operate their automobiles with reasonable care, taking into account the actual and potential dangers existing from weather, road, traffic and other conditions.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.