Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carvel Corp. v. Bryfogle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carvel Corp. v. Bryfogle Anchor | neutral | “it is well settled that a municipality has a duty 'to construct and maintain its highways in a reasonably safe condition, taking into account such factors as the traffic conditions apprehended, the terrain encountered and fiscal practicality” | 4 |
| 2 | In re Douglas E.S. | neutral | “that the accident would have occurred regardless of the condition of the” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.