Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from De Hoyos v. Mukasey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | De Hoyos v. Mukasey Anchor | green | “the question for the court is whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.” | 3 |
| 2 | Yetiv v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development | green | “one of the violations for which civil penalties may be imposed is the failure to provide hud with annual audited financial statements.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.