Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Inc Anchor | green | “(1) the class is 'defined with reference to objective criteria'; and (2) there is 'a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition.” | 23 |
| 2 | Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLC | green | “every putative class action must satisfy the four requirements of rule 23(a) and the requirements of either rule 23(b)(1), (2), or (3).” | 21 |
| 3 | Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Inc | green | “a plaintiff seeking certification of a rule 23(b)(3) class must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the class is ascertainable.” | 19 |
| 4 | Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Inc | green | “defined with reference to objective criteria; and (2) there is a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.