Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrew Flores CANTU-TZIN v. Gary JOHNSON, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrew Flores CANTU-TZIN v. Gary JOHNSON, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division Anchor | green | “the tenor of the majority discussion in lonchar is that federal courts should not intervene to create equitable reasons for denying stays of execution when federal law and the habeas rules have prescribed principles applicable to the complex mix of equities in capital cases.” | 3 |
| 2 | Dobbs v. Zant | green | “i am willing to make an exception from that previously stated general' internal rule in capital cases - but only where there is a realistic likelihood that the technical error' affected the conviction or the sentence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.