Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio) Anchor | green | “the evidence of private and government hostility toward the swp and its members established a reasonable probability that disclosing the names of contributors and recipients would subject them to threats, harassment, and reprisals.” | 3 |
| 2 | Federal Election Commission v. Hall-Tyner Election Campaign Committee | green | “the evidence relied on by the district judge included the extensive body of state and federal legislation subjecting communist party members to civil disability and criminal liability, reports and affidavits documenting the history of governmental surveillance and harassment of …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.