Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from STATE OF NEW YORK, on Behalf of Margaret BODNAR, Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | STATE OF NEW YORK, on Behalf of Margaret BODNAR, Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellant Anchor | green | “isolation but rather will view it in light of other evidence that detracts from it.” | 36 |
| 2 | Poupore v. Astrue | green | “there is work in the national economy that the claimant can do.” | 30 |
| 3 | Barry v. Colvin | green | “the commissioner must consider objective medical evidence, opinions of examining or treating physicians, subjective evidence submitted by the claimant, as well as the claimant's background, such as age, education, or work history.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.