Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Labor Relations Board v. Vemco, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Labor Relations Board v. Vemco, Inc. Anchor | green | “findings of facts, as well as its application of law to fact, may not be disturbed where substantial evidence on the record taken as a whole supports the board's findings and conclusions.” | 3 |
| 2 | United Parcel Service, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner | green | “whether the employer's conduct tends to be coercive or tends to interfere with the employees' exercise of their rights.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.