Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Town Council of New Harmony v. Parker Anchor | green | “it is well-established that, if an administrative remedy is available, it must be pursued before a claimant is allowed access to the courts.” | 4 |
| 2 | Carter v. Nugent Sand Co. | green | “an administrative remedy is readily available, filing a declaratory judgment action is not a suitable alternative.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.