Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harry Palmer v. Eldon Braun.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harry Palmer v. Eldon Braun Anchor | green | “is within the sound discretion of the district court.” | 24 |
| 2 | Northeastern Florida Chapter Of The Association Of General Contractors Of America v. City Of Jacksonville | green | “the chief function of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo until the merits of the controversy can be fully and fairly adjudicated.” | 12 |
| 3 | McDonald's Corp. v. Robertson | green | “in this circuit, a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy not to be granted unless the movant clearly established the burden of persuasion as to the four requisites.” | 11 |
| 4 | All Care Nursing Service, Inc. v. Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc., P.D.Q. Nurse, Inc. v. South Florida Hospital Association, Inc. | green | “is the exception rather than the rule,” | 10 |
| 5 | Joe Church, Gregory Jacobs, Michael Dooly, and Frank Chisom v. City of Huntsville | green | “the absence of a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury would, standing alone, make preliminary injunctive relief improper” | 10 |
| 6 | Harry Palmer v. Eldon Braun | green | “is within the sound discretion of the district court....” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.