Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland, N.A. Anchor | green | “the statute's individualized focus contemplates a case-by-case determination of whether a given impairment substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of the individual” | 3 |
| 2 | Tschanz v. Sweetwater County School District Number One | green | “the impairment must substantially limit one or more of the individual's major life activities.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.