Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jacinto v. PennyMac Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacinto v. PennyMac Corp. Anchor | green | “in reviewing a district court order granting or denying judicial review in an fmp matter, this court gives deference to a district court's factual determinations and examines its legal determinations,” | 3 |
| 2 | Pryor v. Pryor | green | “even a deed reciting that the owner owned the estate as his separate property would not of itself overcome the presumption.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.