Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Anchor | green | “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” | 41 |
| 2 | Kent K. v. Bobby M. | green | “parents possess a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children.” | 20 |
| 3 | Matter of Appeal in Pima County Etc. | green | “in considering the evidence it is well settled that an appellate court will not substitute its own opinion for that of the trial court.” | 10 |
| 4 | Aleise H. v. Dcs | green | “foremost concern . . . is protecting a child's interest in stability and security.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.