Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R. Anchor | green | “our scope of review is limited to considering the evidence of record, and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the commonwealth as the verdict winner.” | 27 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Beasley | green | “this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the factfinder, and where the record contains support for the convictions, they may not be disturbed.” | 12 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Smith | green | “this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the factfinder, and where the record contains support for the convictions, they may not be disturbed.” | 9 |
| 4 | Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R. | green | “our standard of review is de novo, however, our scope of review is limited to considering the evidence of record, and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the commonwealth as the verdict winner.” | 7 |
| 5 | Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R. | green | “our standard of review is de novo; however, our scope of review is limited to considering the evidence of record, and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the commonwealth as the verdict winner.” | 5 |
| 6 | Commonwealth v. Vogelsong | green | “unless the evidence is so weak and inconclusive that as a matter of law no probability of fact may be drawn from the combined circumstances.” | 5 |
| 7 | Commonwealth v. Martin | green | “further, we note that the entire trial record is evaluated and all evidence received against the defendant is considered, being cognizant that the trier of fact is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence.” | 5 |
| 8 | Commonwealth v. Martin | green | “the commonwealth may sustain its burden by means of wholly circumstantial evidence.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.