Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hobonny Club, Inc. v. McEachern.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hobonny Club, Inc. v. McEachern Anchor | green | “this court has held that lands lying between the usual high water line and the usual low water line on tidal navigable watercourses enjoy a special or unique status, being held by the state in trust for public purposes.” | 3 |
| 2 | Coburg Dairy, Inc. v. Lesser | green | “one asserting title to this land must prove a specific grant from the sovereign, which is strictly construed against the grantee.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.