Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morton v. GTE North Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morton v. GTE North Inc. Anchor | green | “the legislative history of the ada reveals that the term 'qualified' refers to whether the individual was qualified at the time of the job action in question.” | 3 |
| 2 | Elstner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. | green | “an impairment that affects only a narrow range of jobs can be regarded either as not reaching a major life activity or as not substantially limiting one.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.