Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Young v. Guild.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Young v. Guild Anchor | green | “the only requirement is that there has been substantial evidence from which the jury could infer that the evidence was authentic.” | 3 |
| 2 | Douglas Walters v. State of Mississippi | green | “in other words, the proponent of the evidence is not required to rule out all possibilities inconsistent with authenticity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.