Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 74 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Omi Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company Of Canada.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Omi Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company Of Canada Anchor | green | “must present a compelling case demonstrating 'that the presence of some other considerations would render jurisdiction unreasonable.” | 18 |
| 2 | Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, Inc. | green | “because oklahoma's long-arm statute permits the exercise of jurisdiction that is consistent with the united states constitution, the personal jurisdiction inquiry under oklahoma law collapses into the single due process inquiry.” | 16 |
| 3 | Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, Inc. | green | “the due process clause permits the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant 'so long as there exist minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum state.” | 16 |
| 4 | Conoco Inc. v. Agrico Chemical Company | green | “due process requires that the nonresident defendant's conduct and connection with the forum state are such that the nonresident could reasonably anticipate being haled into court in that state.” | 12 |
| 5 | Pacific Atlantic Trading Co., Inc. v. The M/V Main Express | green | “the interstate judicial system's interest in obtaining the most efficient resolution of controversies,” | 7 |
| 6 | Pacific Atlantic Trading Co., Inc. v. The M/V Main Express | green | “this factor may weigh heavily in cases where a plaintiff's chances of recovery will be greatly diminished by forcing him to litigate in another forum because of that forum's laws or because the burden may be so overwhelming as to practically foreclose pursuit of the lawsuit.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.