Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from GQA v. Harrison County Dept. of Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GQA v. Harrison County Dept. of Human Services Anchor | green | “such relevant evidence as reasonable minds might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 3 |
| 2 | May v. Harrison County Department of Human Services | green | “only if reasonable men could not have found as the youth court did beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.