Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tita v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tita v. State Anchor | green | “in aggregate theft cases, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the date of the commission of the final incident of theft and therefore the entire theft is deemed to occur on the date of the most recent theft.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Weaver | green | “by holding that a special owner need not have a greater right to possession than the accused except for at any one point in time during a multi-year aggregate theft, the state's burden of proof has been effectively whittled away to nothing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.