Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Slater v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slater v. State Anchor | green | “it is not enough to presume or suspicion that someone will assert his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to testify. he must be called to the stand and there refuse to testify before he becomes unavailable due to invoking the fifth amendment.” | 3 |
| 2 | Balfour v. State | green | “criminal defendant must be allowed to call witnesses to the stand even though the defendant is aware that the witness, if called, will invoke the fifth amendment to every question.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.