Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Earley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Earley Anchor | green | “in determining an appropriate sanction, we consider 'the nature of the violations, the need for deterrence, protection of the public, maintenance of the reputation of the bar as a whole, and the violator's fitness to continue to practice law,' as well as any aggravating and miti…” | 4 |
| 2 | Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. Taylor | green | “seek a degree of consistency in our disciplinary cases with respect to sanctions.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.