Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School District Anchor | green | “reasonably believe he was disclosing a violation of state or federal law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Love v. Motion Industries, Inc. | green | “any statute, rule or regulation that may have been violated by the disclosed conduct,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.