Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kemp-Golden v. Department of Children & Family Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kemp-Golden v. Department of Children & Family Services Anchor | green | “her participation in the administrative hearing amounted to de facto intervention to which no one objected and, consequently, vested her with party status.” | 3 |
| 2 | Marsh v. Illinois Racing Board | green | “specifically, the legislature designed the review law 'to channel into a single procedure the judicial review of the decisions made by administrative agencies in particular cases.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.