Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 73 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc. Anchor | green | “the party invoking federal jurisdiction has the burden to establish that it is proper, and there is a presumption against its existence.” | 40 |
| 2 | Kenney v. Helix TCS | green | “a rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss only requires the court to determine whether it has authority to adjudicate the matter.” | 21 |
| 3 | Cristina Galeas Castaneda v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “in the presence rather than the absence of statutory authority.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.