Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. HERMAN L..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. HERMAN L. Anchor | green | “after carefully reviewing in a bench decision all of the criteria listed in cpl 210.40 (1) and finding several of them applicable and compelling” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Hirsch | green | “while the question of whether to dismiss an indictment in the furtherance of justice is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, this discretion is not absolute; the issue on appeal is whether the court abused or improvidently exercised its discretionary authority” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.