Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Anchor | green | “even though a pro se complaint must be construed liberally, the complaint must still 'present a claim on which the court can grant relief.” | 4 |
| 2 | Jackson v. ASA Holdings, LLC | green | “a conclusory allegation that defendants wrongfully foreclosed is totally inadequate to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.