Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Crankfield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Crankfield Anchor | green | “undue delay between the occurrence of the alleged cause for withdrawal of a guilty plea and the filing of a motion under crim.r. 32.1 is a factor adversely affecting the credibility of the movant and militating against the granting of the motion.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Reeder | green | “may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his or her plea” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.